Legal Aspects of Memorandum of Understanding from the Legal Perspective of Contract Law in the Civil Code

Authors

  • J.E. Melky Purba Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70321/ijslcj.v2i3.160

Keywords:

memorandum of understanding, law of engagement, preliminary agreement

Abstract

Memorandum of understanding(MoU) or memorandum of understanding is an instrument frequently used in business relations and institutional cooperation in Indonesia, both by private and public legal entities. However, until now the Civil Code has not explicitly regulated the term MoU, thus giving rise to debate regarding its status and binding force from the perspective of contract law. On the one hand, MoUs are often positioned merely as moral bonds or gentlemen's agreements that do not give rise to legal consequences of contract. On the other hand, the view is growing that MoUs that have fulfilled the essential elements of an agreement can actually be treated as binding agreements as agreements under the Civil Code.

This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the MoU from the perspective of the law of obligations in the Civil Code, specifically in relation to Article 1313, Article 1320, and Article 1338 of the Civil Code, and examine whether the MoU can be qualified as an agreement or only a preliminary agreement. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach through a literature study of classical and contemporary literature on the law of obligations and the MoU. The results of the study indicate that the position of the MoU is largely determined by the content and intentions of the parties. If the MoU only contains the main points of global cooperation, without any concrete obligations, the MoU tends to be understood as a morally binding pre-contract. However, if the MoU contains essential clauses of the agreement and meets the requirements for a valid agreement, then the MoU can be qualified as an agreement that gives rise to an obligation and is therefore subject to the regime of default and civil liability. Thus, the certainty of the position of the MoU requires careful formulation of the content, as well as the affirmation of the parties' objectives from the beginning of its preparation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 1986. Contract Law. Bandung: Alumni.

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 1990. Indonesian Civil Law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2004. Contract Law. Bandung: Alumni.

Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2011. Indonesian Civil Law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Abhytama, Dewa Gede Agus. 2025. “The Urgency and Position of Memorandum of Understanding in Indonesian Contract Law.” Wicara: Journal of Law 5(3).

Dongoran, HM 2024. "Obligations Arising from Contracts and Laws and Their Implications in Indonesian Civil Law." Ishlah: A Law Journal 27(1).

Jamil, Nury Khoiril. 2022. “Legal Certainty of Memorandums of Understanding in the Covid-19 Pandemic Conditions in Valid Contract Law in Indonesia.” Acta Comitas 7(2).

Luthfi, FD 2017. “Legal Implementation of the Position of Memorandum of Understanding in the Indonesian Contract Law System.” Journal of Sharia and Law, UIN Antasari.

Mabhan, Muhammad Ali. 2019. “The Position and Legal Power of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Reviewed from the Perspective of Contract Law in the Civil Code.” Meraja Journal 2(1).

Makmur, ADM 2023. “Observations on Contract Law Regarding the Authority of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).” LEGAL: Journal of Law 5(1).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Legal Research. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Miru, Ahmadi. 2009. Contract Law (Explanation of the Meaning of Articles 1233 to 1456 of the Civil Code). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Miru, Ahmadi and Sutarman Yodo. 2017. Consumer Protection Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mutiara, Azamta Besnata and Arief Suryono. 2024. “Legal Analysis of the Legal Status of Memoranda of Understanding in the Legal Institution of Contracts in Indonesia.” Amendment: Journal of Indonesian Defense, Political and Legal Sciences 1(2): 95–106.

Salim HS. 2007. Contract Design and Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Salim HS. 2011. Contract Design and Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sanjaya, I Made Agus. 2023. “Legal Consequences of Violations of Memorandum of Understanding in Business Contracts.” Journal of Legal Perspectives 23(2).

Satrio, J. 2001. Contract Law: Contracts Born from Agreements, Book I. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Setiyaningsih, Devi. 2020. “The Legal Position and Power of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) as a Pre-Contract Stage Reviewed from the Perspective of Contract Law.” Jurnal Privat Law 8(2).

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2006. Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Subekti, R. 2005. Contract Law. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudaryati, S. 2022. “Legal Aspects of Memorandum of Understanding from the Perspective of Contract Law in the Civil Code.” Jurnal Rechtens 11(1): 53–66.

Yuanitasari, D. 2020. “Development of Contract Law in the Context of Modern Business Contracts.” Acta Diurnal: Journal of Law 3(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

J.E. Melky Purba. (2025). Legal Aspects of Memorandum of Understanding from the Legal Perspective of Contract Law in the Civil Code. International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice, 2(3), 902–907. https://doi.org/10.70321/ijslcj.v2i3.160

Issue

Section

Articles