CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DECISION TO CANCEL THE DETERMINATION OF A CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION SUSPECT THROUGH PRE-TRIAL (Study of the Political-Legal Relationship of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution)

Authors

  • Andi Fahri Hasibuan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Riza Zarzani Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Henry Aspan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Legal Politics, Suspect Designation, Corruption Eradication Commission, Pretrial.

Abstract

This research analyzes the characteristics of pretrial rulings that annul the suspect designation by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and its implications for the performance and independence of the institution. Regulatory changes through Law No. 10 of 2015 and Law no. 19 of 2019 pose challenges related to the principles of justice, legal certainty, and the integrity of legal processes. Pretrial decisions that invalidate the suspect designation emphasize the importance of adherence to legal procedures and the protection of human rights in the enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Judicial oversight through pretrial is necessary to maintain a balance between KPK's independence and the protection of individual rights. The findings underscore the need for clearer and more accountable regulations to ensure effective and fair anti-corruption efforts

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldivie, Muhammad Hirzi, Asmadi Prima Sembiring, Nicolas Sembiring, Jonatan Natanael Sihotang, and Indra Utama Tanjung. 2024. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NATIONAL LAW.” Juris Sinergi Journal 1 (1): 30–34.

Hakim, Aulia Rahman, and Indra Utama Tanjung. 2024. "The Principle of the Reverse Burden of Proof of Corruption Crimes in the Legal System in Indonesia." In Law Synergy Conference Proceedings, 1:7–11.

Huda, Ulil Abshor Nurul, and Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie. 2023. “Reverse Proof in Corruption Crimes in Indonesia in the Framework of Guaranteeing the Principle of Legal Certainty.” Journal Evidence Of Law 2 (2): 63–72.

Indra Utama Tanjung. 2024. BASICS OF LEGAL RESEARCH METHODS. Karanganyar: CV Pustaka Dikara). https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=rToGqjUAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=rToGqjUAAAAJ:Wp0gIr-vW9MC.

Juliani, Rika Dwi, and Syofiaty Lubis. 2023. “Return of Corrupt Assets and Eradication of Corruption Through Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture: Review of Indonesian Law and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003.” EDUCATIO Journal: Indonesian Education Journal 9 (1): 273–80.

Puluhulawa, Mohamad Danial, Fenty U Puluhulawa, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. 2020. “Annotation of Legal Protection for Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborators in Efforts to Eradicate Criminal Acts of Corruption.” Al Ahkam 16 (2): 56–74.

Purba, J E. 2006. “A Review of Corruption Crimes Committed by Civil Servants and Efforts to Overcome Them. Case Study at the Medan District Court and the North Sumatra High Prosecutor's Office.” Medan Area University.

Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari. 2017. “The Role of the Prosecutor's Office in Eradicating Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia After Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.” Al-Adl: Journal of Law 9 (1): 49–66.

Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari, Teguh Prasetyo, and Jawade Hafidz. 2018. “Legal Analysis of the Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as a Prosecutor of Corruption Crimes.” UNIFIKASI: Journal of Legal Studies 5 (1): 33–44.

Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari, and Muhammad Arif Sahlepi. 2019. “Wiretapping Authority in Eradicating Corruption.” Criminal Law and Legal Development 1 (2).

Setyawati, Ida Ayu. 2014. “Reverse Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Cases with Corruption Crime Predicate.” Brawijaya University.

Sitepu, Rida Ista, and Yusona Piadi. 2019. “Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Punishment of Corruption Offenders.” Jurnal Rechten: Penelitian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 1 (1): 67–75.

Wiriadinata, Wahyu. 2012. “Corruption and the Reversal of the Burden of Proof.” Constitutional Journal 9 (2): 313–32.

Zarzani, T Riza, Hendry Aspan, and Andi Syah Putra Lubis. 2021. “CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (Court Decision Number 1945/Pid. Sus/2019/PN Mdn).” International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) 2 (2): 67–76.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-02

How to Cite

Andi Fahri Hasibuan, Riza Zarzani, & Henry Aspan. (2025). CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DECISION TO CANCEL THE DETERMINATION OF A CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION SUSPECT THROUGH PRE-TRIAL (Study of the Political-Legal Relationship of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution). International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice, 2(2), 534–541. Retrieved from https://journal.sinergilp.com/index.php/ijslcj/article/view/109