The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Minor Theft Cases Under Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 on the Development of Customary Life and Traditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70321/ijslcj.v2i3.147Keywords:
restorative justice, Acehnese customary courts, minor theftAbstract
This study discusses the implementation of restorative justice in resolving petty theft cases in Aceh based on Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 concerning the Development of Customary Life and Customs, with an emphasis on the role of village customary institutions and the support of regional regulations in strengthening the effectiveness of case resolution. The restorative justice paradigm is seen as an alternative to the retributive approach that has dominated the national criminal justice system, emphasizing the restoration of the original state, the responsibility of the perpetrator, and the involvement of victims and the community. In the context of Aceh, the position of customary institutions is legally recognized through Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh, Qanun Number 9 of 2008, and strengthened by the Joint Decree of the Governor of Aceh, the Chief of the Aceh Police, and the Aceh Customary Council in 2011–2012, and Aceh Governor Regulation Number 60 of 2013. These regulations provide a legal basis as well as technical guidelines for the implementation of village customary justice in handling petty theft cases through customary deliberations in the meunasah.
The research method used is a socio-legal approach with literature review and observation, combining normative analysis of laws and regulations with empirical studies of social practices in the community. The results show that resolving petty theft cases through village customary courts is faster, cheaper, and more acceptable to the community, and is more effective in maintaining social harmony than formal justice. However, challenges remain, such as potential injustice in customary deliberations, limited documentation, and coordination with law enforcement officials. Therefore, guidance, supervision, and capacity building of customary institutions are needed to ensure the principles of restorative justice are truly realized.
This study concludes that the Aceh model in integrating customary law with formal law can be a national reference in developing a more effective, humane, and local wisdom-based mechanism for resolving minor criminal cases.
Downloads
References
Books and Journals
Abdurahman. “Customary Justice in Aceh.” Qanun Journal, Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, 2009.
Amdani, Yusi. “The Concept of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases of Theft by Children Based on Islamic Law and Acehnese Custom.” Al-'Adalah Vol. 13, No. 1 (2016): 81–76.
Amdani, Yusi. “The Dispute Resolution Process in Aceh's Village-Level Customary Court Institution.” Probation Journal, Faculty of Law, IAIN Takengon, Central Aceh, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2016): 64–66.
Bahreisy, Budi., Ferdy Saputra., and Hidayat. “Implementation of Restorative Justice Through Traditional Institutions for Children in Conflict with the Law in Lhokseumawe City.” EXECUTION Vol. 4, No. 1 (2022): 89–105.
Badruzzaman and Ismail. Anthology of Customary Law. Banda Aceh: Gua Hira, 2003.
Berutu, Ali Geno. Implementation of Aceh Qanun in Subulussalam City (Study of Qanun No. 12, 13, and 14 of 2003). 2016.
Dewi, Sulastri. Introduction to Customary Law. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, Faculty of Islamic Law, Bandung Islamic University, 2015.
Faisal, Hamdani and Syahputra Ardian. “Analysis of the Amount of Assets Classified as Petty Theft (A Comparative Study of Criminal Law and Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012).” Suloh: Scientific Journal of Master of Law Students Vol. 8, No. 1 (2020): 271–281.
Fathor, Rahman. “The Existence of Customary Justice in Indonesian Legislation.” Samudra Keadilan Law Journal, Faculty of Law, Samudra University, Langsa, 2018.
Fitria, Aja., Rahma Fitri., and Sopar. “The Role of Customary Institutions in Improving Religious Life through Corporate Social Responsibility Programs in Gampong Buloh, West Aceh Regency.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Vol. 2, No. 1 (2025): 650–658.
Harist, T. Muhammad Hay. The Role of Village Customary Institutions in Mediating Domestic Disputes (A Case Study in Pango Deah Village, Ulee Kareng District). Dissertation. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2018.
Idami, Risa Putri. Household Dispute Resolution Mechanism by Village Customary Institutions According to the Review of Sharia Mediation (Case Study of Sibreh Keumudee Village, Sukamakmur District). Dissertation. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2018.
Jum'addi. “The Strategy of the Aceh Traditional Council (MMA) in Preserving Acehnese Culture.” Al-Idarah Journal, Faculty of Da'wah and Communication, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2018.
Mardjono, Reksodiputro in Yusi Amdani. “The Dispute Resolution Process in Aceh's Village-Level Customary Court Institution.” Probation Journal, Faculty of Law, IAIN Takengon, Central Aceh, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2016): 64–66.
Mirza, Syahputra. “Restorative Justice as a Form of Law in Legislation.” Journal of Administration, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2020): 27.
Nanda, Amalia. “Model of Dispute Resolution and Customary Justice in Aceh.” Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2017: 165.
Rahmi, Isnatul, and Rizanizarli. “The Application of Restorative Justice in Resolving Criminal Acts of Theft by Children from an Acehnese Customary Perspective.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 1 (2020): 11–20.
Safira, Arifa. The Role of Village Customary Institutions in Resolving Inheritance Cases (A Case Study in the Lhoknga Settlement, Aceh Besar Regency). Dissertation. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2025.
Susanna, Eva, and Yusnaidi Kamaruzzaman. “Resolving Minor Crime Cases at the Village Level through the Implementation of Restorative Justice.” Journal of Law and Government Science Vol. 10, No. 1 (2024): 7–14.
Wati, Mainal. The Effectiveness of Village Customary Institutions in Resolving Husband-Wife Disputes (A Case Study in Woyla District, West Aceh Regency). Dissertation. Library Unit, 2021.
Legislation
Indonesia. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Indonesia. Criminal Code (KUHP).
Indonesia. Law Number 44 of 1999 concerning the Implementation of the Special Status of the Special Region of Aceh Province.
Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of the Limits for Minor Crimes.
Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia. Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice.
Aceh Government. Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 concerning the Development of Customary Life and Traditions.
Aceh Government. Aceh Qanun Number 10 of 2008 concerning Customary Institutions.
Aceh Government. Joint Decree of the Governor of Aceh, the Aceh Police Chief, and the Aceh Traditional Council Number 189/677/2011–1054/MMA/XII/2011–B/121/1/2012 concerning the Implementation of Gampong and Mukim Customary Courts.
Aceh Government. Aceh Governor Regulation Number 60 of 2013 concerning the Implementation of the Settlement of Customary and Traditional Problems.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hartana Hartana , T. Riza Zarzani , Fitri Rafianti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











